CHAIR'S REPORT
I have found it highly rewarding to chair the advisory board during my first term of appointment over the past two years. During this time, the remainder of the recommendations stemming from the 2007–08 Review of Statutory Self–Regulation of the Migration Advice Profession have been progressed. In addition, the board has provided advice to the Office of the Migration Agents Registration Authority (the Authority) on a wide range of issues as it focuses its regulatory effort to ensure that consumers seeking or obtaining migration services from registered migration agents can do so with confidence that they will receive competent and ethical advice.
Registered migration agents
Last year, I commented on the crucial role that registered migration agents play in facilitating the entry of people into Australia. The advisory board remains conscious of the significant level of trust clients place in registered migration agents and, particularly, of the position of the most vulnerable clients and their need to be able to obtain low-cost migration services that they can trust. The knowledge, professionalism and ethical standards of registered migration agents have been a particular focus in the advisory board’s considerations this past year as it has worked with the Authority to develop further the regulatory framework.
The advisory board
The Authority’s advisory board met four times in 2012–13 to consider and provide advice in relation to ongoing and emerging issues affecting the profession. In particular, the advisory board provided guidance in relation to:
- amendments to the continuing professional development (CPD) framework aimed at creating greater clarity and flexibility around standards and more choice for agents in activities that best suit developmental needs. The strengthened support for the not-for-profit sector and encouragement of pro bono assistance inherent in the changes was a key consideration for the board.
- the ongoing proposal for improvements to the knowledge requirement for entry to the profession, emphasising the need for a flexible and cost-effective pathway focused on practical outcomes and raising standards
- enhancements to the ethics framework, including the addition of further Ethics Bytes modules focusing on client relationships and conflict of interest
- proposed changes to the code of conduct to provide greater clarity and guidance to registered migration agents
- the potential for implementing an offshore regulation scheme and the possible options, including overseas models, for research and examination
- the implementation of recommendations resulting from the complaint-handling review, including development of a framework to consider risk and deliver outcomes within agreed time frames. Training for officers in conciliation techniques to support new processes for early complaint resolution was also discussed.
- amendments to legislation and policy concerning the not-for-profit sector to clarify the nature of the business operations and organisational structures that are the intended subjects of these provisions
- implementation of the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Agreement in the context of the immigration advice profession in Australia
- consultation on and development of the Client monies toolkit for registered migration agents, a resource aimed at helping agents implement best practice requirements and improve consumer protection
- evaluation of the effectiveness of the Authority’s communications strategy and options for further improvements. Guidance was provided in relation to stakeholder engagement, use of preferred media, community languages and greater availability of online products and information.
- the Authority’s strategic direction, operational performance and internal governance.
Thank you
Members of the advisory board have continued to provide valuable insight on the range of matters that have been considered, drawing both on their wide experience and on their individual areas of expertise. I thank all members for the high standard of their advice and the important contribution they have made over the year.
On behalf of the advisory board, I would also like to recognise the significant contribution made by Ms Christine Sykes, who retired as CEO of the Authority and member of the advisory board on 30 September 2012. Christine’s counsel, openness, and respect for their different views was highly appreciated by all her colleagues. The advisory board looks forward to continuing to work closely with the new CEO, Mr Stephen Wood, on issues relating to the migration advice profession.
![]()
Helen Williams AO
Chair

